If a referendum is made on the view of Akhand Bharat in India under international institutions, the greatest fact and cruelty of the present history will be clear.
Kashmir is very close to Pakistan but nothing can be said about how far Kashmir's independence from India is. What can be said is that even in this scenario of despair, brave and determined Kashmiris have raised the flag of independence from India. Various days of solidarity with Kashmiris across the world are being celebrated through processions and rhetoric, while Kashmiris have been giving their blood for 12 months to find a conscience in the world.
The sympathetic and soft-hearted, who sheds tears of tears over the sufferings of humanity, cannot see the small pieces of Kashmiris at the hands of Indian soldiers.
The prominent figures in Europe and the United States, powerful global decision-making contractors, have privately acknowledged that in the modern world, the longest history of state oppression and the countless sacrifices for freedom movement is being written in Kashmir. But for the blunt face of human rights, these individuals, when it comes to governmental status, have a smooth face by calling the flowing blood of Kashmiris a matter between two countries.
If they are to be questioned for this shameful double standard, then the only thing that comes to fruition is that the business interests of the West and the US cannot be harmed by annoying a very populous country like India. Even the West and the United States can achieve lasting peace in Asia without harming their business interests. The history of India's thousands of years in the sub-continent suggests that from the beginning there were several small states in the region that were governed by their own kings.
Muslim rulers united these small states in the subcontinent and made it a large populous country.
This was probably a major mistake of the Muslim rulers as Hindus sought to occupy the entire subterranean region of the subcontinent after the departure of the British in 1947, for which they shouted a single India. Who among the Hindu professors, calling himself the best scholar and historian of the world, cannot tell when India was a secluded India before the Muslims and British rule? The Hindu religious book Mahabharata also mentions the struggles of Hindu cousins.
This religious book of Hindus clearly states how bloody relationships for the occupation of one another's kingdoms were thirsty for each other's blood, but Hindus threw dust into the eyes of the world after 1947 and those pages of history disappeared. Of which the original Indian land was based on several states.
Powerful countries can still bring peace to Asia and continue their business interests by reading this book of India's history.
If the present India is unstable and violently divided into historically smaller states like the old India, then the aggressive throne, the occupation of others and the shedding of blood, will lead to the departure of the present throne. Will Secondly, the smaller states of the subcontinent will also facilitate Western countries and the United States to conduct business transactions with these new states.
These proposed states will be equal to or larger than the size of many European countries. The present India, where there is a bloodthirsty neighbor for its neighbors, is also a doom for different races and nationalities in its population.
The lower caste Hindus, Tamils, Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Bengali, Mizoram, Nagaland, Assam, Tripura etc. and most of the Kashmiris are the nationalities that ignited the philosophy of self-rulers of India for the last 72 years. Have been
If a referendum is made on the view of Akhand Bharat in India under international institutions, then the greatest fact and cruelty of the present history will be clear. The fact is that the aforementioned nations of India would like to establish their own separate states instead of Akhand India, and the cruelty that Akhand India's short-sighted support group has tied more than 80% of India's population to its clan.
The most shocking chapter in India's bloodiest pages is that of Kashmir. Those who know the fact know that Indian occupation of Kashmir goes to the head of someone else along with Nehru. The current Indian troops occupying Kashmir and the present tyrannical Indian rulers should be more grateful to Nehru's wife in this regard, forcing mounting a special knife with Nehru's wife, Mountbatten placed a knife on Kashmir's neck.
Hindus believe that good deeds die in the first life, after the death of the good ones in the second life, while the bad ones in the first birth appear badly in the second life after death. According to this belief of Hindus, the sick and itchy dog whiskers that are heard in the streets of Delhi will surely belong to Mountbatten and if in human form Mountbatten had a second birth in 1947, the misfortunes of his first born. Why do Kashmiris get punishment?
Speaking of logic, apart from emotions, the practice of publicizing confidential documents worldwide is on the rise.
It requires that Nehru and subsequent Indian rulers who had been official correspondence or meetings to divide and occupy Kashmir in 1947 and thereafter, and those Indian rulers from some other countries. There should be books and meetings to open them to the world so that the true black face of secular and democratic India can be exposed.
If a referendum of Akhand India or an independent state is made in the existing territorial territories of India, it would certainly be clear that the theory of Akhand India is a state vampire drinking human blood instead of a government umpire. Therefore, for the peace of the world, it is important to look at Akhand India in the present India as separate independent old historicals of different nationalities like Kashmir, Tamil, Sikh, Muslim, Christian, Bengali, Dalit, Mizoram, Nagaland, Assam and Tripura etc. Natural states are established.
Kashmir is very close to Pakistan but nothing can be said about how far Kashmir's independence from India is. What can be said is that even in this scenario of despair, brave and determined Kashmiris have raised the flag of independence from India. Various days of solidarity with Kashmiris across the world are being celebrated through processions and rhetoric, while Kashmiris have been giving their blood for 12 months to find a conscience in the world.
The sympathetic and soft-hearted, who sheds tears of tears over the sufferings of humanity, cannot see the small pieces of Kashmiris at the hands of Indian soldiers.
The prominent figures in Europe and the United States, powerful global decision-making contractors, have privately acknowledged that in the modern world, the longest history of state oppression and the countless sacrifices for freedom movement is being written in Kashmir. But for the blunt face of human rights, these individuals, when it comes to governmental status, have a smooth face by calling the flowing blood of Kashmiris a matter between two countries.
If they are to be questioned for this shameful double standard, then the only thing that comes to fruition is that the business interests of the West and the US cannot be harmed by annoying a very populous country like India. Even the West and the United States can achieve lasting peace in Asia without harming their business interests. The history of India's thousands of years in the sub-continent suggests that from the beginning there were several small states in the region that were governed by their own kings.
Muslim rulers united these small states in the subcontinent and made it a large populous country.
This was probably a major mistake of the Muslim rulers as Hindus sought to occupy the entire subterranean region of the subcontinent after the departure of the British in 1947, for which they shouted a single India. Who among the Hindu professors, calling himself the best scholar and historian of the world, cannot tell when India was a secluded India before the Muslims and British rule? The Hindu religious book Mahabharata also mentions the struggles of Hindu cousins.
This religious book of Hindus clearly states how bloody relationships for the occupation of one another's kingdoms were thirsty for each other's blood, but Hindus threw dust into the eyes of the world after 1947 and those pages of history disappeared. Of which the original Indian land was based on several states.
Powerful countries can still bring peace to Asia and continue their business interests by reading this book of India's history.
If the present India is unstable and violently divided into historically smaller states like the old India, then the aggressive throne, the occupation of others and the shedding of blood, will lead to the departure of the present throne. Will Secondly, the smaller states of the subcontinent will also facilitate Western countries and the United States to conduct business transactions with these new states.
These proposed states will be equal to or larger than the size of many European countries. The present India, where there is a bloodthirsty neighbor for its neighbors, is also a doom for different races and nationalities in its population.
The lower caste Hindus, Tamils, Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Bengali, Mizoram, Nagaland, Assam, Tripura etc. and most of the Kashmiris are the nationalities that ignited the philosophy of self-rulers of India for the last 72 years. Have been
If a referendum is made on the view of Akhand Bharat in India under international institutions, then the greatest fact and cruelty of the present history will be clear. The fact is that the aforementioned nations of India would like to establish their own separate states instead of Akhand India, and the cruelty that Akhand India's short-sighted support group has tied more than 80% of India's population to its clan.
The most shocking chapter in India's bloodiest pages is that of Kashmir. Those who know the fact know that Indian occupation of Kashmir goes to the head of someone else along with Nehru. The current Indian troops occupying Kashmir and the present tyrannical Indian rulers should be more grateful to Nehru's wife in this regard, forcing mounting a special knife with Nehru's wife, Mountbatten placed a knife on Kashmir's neck.
Hindus believe that good deeds die in the first life, after the death of the good ones in the second life, while the bad ones in the first birth appear badly in the second life after death. According to this belief of Hindus, the sick and itchy dog whiskers that are heard in the streets of Delhi will surely belong to Mountbatten and if in human form Mountbatten had a second birth in 1947, the misfortunes of his first born. Why do Kashmiris get punishment?
Speaking of logic, apart from emotions, the practice of publicizing confidential documents worldwide is on the rise.
It requires that Nehru and subsequent Indian rulers who had been official correspondence or meetings to divide and occupy Kashmir in 1947 and thereafter, and those Indian rulers from some other countries. There should be books and meetings to open them to the world so that the true black face of secular and democratic India can be exposed.
If a referendum of Akhand India or an independent state is made in the existing territorial territories of India, it would certainly be clear that the theory of Akhand India is a state vampire drinking human blood instead of a government umpire. Therefore, for the peace of the world, it is important to look at Akhand India in the present India as separate independent old historicals of different nationalities like Kashmir, Tamil, Sikh, Muslim, Christian, Bengali, Dalit, Mizoram, Nagaland, Assam and Tripura etc. Natural states are established.
Comments
Post a Comment